Nowadays celebrities are mainly famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree and disagree?
Undoubtedly, celebrities are making headline for their glamour as well as money than their proffesional accomplishment. But, today the topic asserts that is it setting a negative example for youngsters? I do not quite agree with this veiw. Now, I am going to examine some possible points with the following paragraph.
How the celebrities are setting a negative example for young people? There are number of answers related to this topic. First of all, in my country many celebrities are famous for their glamour and their money and they rule on the heart of the people all around the world. The problem with young people is that many of them blindly follow film stars or sports personalities. Naturally, when they see their favourite star flaunting a flashy lifestyle, this unfortunately, leads to many problems. Famous people are usually rich and have the means to support their extravagant lifestyle. Most of their fans, however, hails from ordinary backgrounds. Due to this reason it impact some problems in the mind of the young generations, but, one cannot blame on them. Apart from that, they are also human beings and it is quite natural for them to have flaws. In any case, they donot say to their fans to do what they do. They always perform something different to entertain to us and give the good suggestions through the different types of programmes, but unfortunately, young generations are not able learn good things alter to this they easily get knowledge about bad news, which creat
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'impacts'?
Suggestion: impacts
...nary backgrounds. Due to this reason it impact some problems in the mind of the young ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, apart from, as well as, first of all, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71703135522 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.6264445545 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344820510602 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11263005766 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084036659163 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285679001562 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150185133647 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.