Nowadays everyone likes to travel. Some people travel alone while others prefer to travel in a group. Discuss both approaches. Give your own opinion with relevant examples from your experience.
It is widely held belief that traveling alone has more benefits, but there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who prefer group traveling.
I am of the opinion that this matter should be debated in the light of several factors before any conclusion can be drawn.
Group tourism has its own advantages for following reasons. The primary reason we have to take into consideration is that group visiting cities and countries is cheap for tourists. For example, they rent a house and divide accommodation payment or can share a hotel room with a double bed. For example, when I visited Germany with my friends and we have paid 1200 dollars for a month and divided this cost for five people. Compare with that, when I traveled to Italy alone I spent 1000 Euro for a hotel for nine night. Also, they can hire one guide when they visit museums or historical places. More importantly, group traveling is safety and your counterparts protect your and give a hand when it is necessary. Apart from that, group visiting is not boring since people discuss the sightseeing and share their emissions during the travel.
On the other hand, traveling alone has its own benefits. The visitor can be independent and can see what he/she prefers. Moreover, tourist plans her/his journey. From my own experience, when I went New York alone I spent three days and visited all must see places while then I met with my group mates in Washington DC, we could not visit some places in four days. Because all of us had an own wish and we decided to vote and visit places that had more supporters.
In conclusion, although there are a number of different points of view regarding this issue, I claim that group visiting is the cheapest and safest method for tourists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Euros'.
Suggestion: Euros
... I traveled to Italy alone I spent 1000 Euro for a hotel for nine night. Also, they ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... visit places that had more supporters. In conclusion, although there are a numb...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71103896104 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47484178866 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.384769539078 780% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4234144518 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246327102034 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830671793032 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900686990358 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113232020027 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757161590307 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.