Some believe that more academic subjects, such as chemistry, physics, and history, should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is widely held belief that precise curriculums, such as chemistry, physics, and history are crucial for pupil but there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who think that driving and kitchen skills should be in the school program. I am of the opinion that this matter should be debated in the light of several factors before any conclusion can be drawn.
First and foremost, the school is the place where pupils are able to gain academic skills. Consequently, chemistry, math, biology, and geography must be included in the school plan. The primary reason we have to take into consideration that these must read subjects would be beneficial when they take an exam and during the university year. For example, pupils who apply to medicine faculty have to bone up with chemistry and biology while teenagers who prefer work at the IT-company, have to ameliorate their math and informatics ability. More importantly, academic programs encourage juveniles’ education and harden their IQ and critical thinking since math, geometry, literature have a both skills such as a theory and practices.
One the other hand, the abilities like cooking, driving, cleaning play an important role in individual’s life. Society members who work at the café or bus companies are able to earn a high salary. Therefore, practical subjects can be in the education plan, but in my view, for the practical tutorials should be divided a minimum time in the school schedule. Moreover, people can learn these practical skills without schooling, since parents or caregivers are able to teach their offspring with these abilities at home.
In conclusion, although there are a number of different points of view regarding this issue, I claim that government and school heads should foster the academic programs because it develops individual’s versatility and strengthens countries economy and social wellbeing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30163934426 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90051103375 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6340693079 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140305506953 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486648332602 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367627425721 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791774142673 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311388814604 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.