People nowadays are buying a wider range of household things (for example television, rice cooker) than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The cutting-edge technologies such as a smart TV, washing machine, and remote controlled technics have brought significant change to our lives in recent years. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this technology has been positive or negative. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary. I personally believe that the benefits of the groundbreaking technologies far outweigh their drawbacks.
First of all, it is undisputable fact that, the household things have revolutionized our lifestyle. In my view, an electro-cooking machine, vacuum cleaner ameliorate peoples’ life to the better side. People do not clean the room or cook the lunch or dinner by a hand. The cutting-edge technics help to people with house chores. As a result, the society members can save their time and dedicate it to children upbringing, reading books or attending to sports clubs. Moreover, people are able to set their own cinema at home and also save their budget that they spent to real cinema’s ticket in the past.
On the other hand, some people put forward the opinion that these trends deteriorate people life style and health. The household things owners do not move to turn on the TV or washing machine and rule the Smart TV or car by the remote control. Doctors concern that sedentary lifestyle leads to overweighting and diabetes. Moreover, grandparents who never see such as things think that their children and grandchildren are lazy.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that household things have a positive impact on modern life because of their influence on time management and saving peoples’ budget.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...s. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this technology h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...chnology has been positive or negative. While there are certainly valid arguments to ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
...bringing, reading books or attending to sports clubs. Moreover, people are able to set...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, while, as to, such as, as a result, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22509225092 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99361848106 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5503609953 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150884083974 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455863649325 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384530512553 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932929366863 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367500546322 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.