Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the past few decades it is seen that the phenomenal upsurge of cross-border travel. While some are concerned that the development may lead to rise to locals’ grudge against tourists, In my point of view this development nourishes mutual understanding of people from distinct cultural backgrounds.
There are some argues that the rise of global tourism is associated with conflict between foreign visitors and local citizens. These opponents claim that tourists tend to show scarce respect for local customs and religious beliefs. Take Thailand for example, certain acts of disrespect for the King are likely to generate resentment from the locals or even worse, visitors may be subject to custodial sentences. However, the scenario can somehow be avoided when foreigners do rigorous research about the host country before their arrival.
However, I think mutual understanding on cultural discrepancy can be promoted as a result of international tourism. Firstly, it is fair to say that this development can open up more opportunities for people from all over the world to establish relationships with local inhabitants. Thus, both tourists’ and locals’ perspectives of cultural distinctiveness in different parts of the world can be significantly broadened. Secondly, not only people’s knowledge of cultural background would be improved, the rise in international travel can boost international cooperation. In further, to facilitate overseas business development, businesses’ embrace of local cultural traits is considered a prerequisite.
In a conclusion, the increase in transnational travel should be seen as a drive for mutual understanding between different people with different cultures rather than the cause of tension.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the past few decades it is seen that the phenomenal upsurge of cros...
^^
Line 7, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aits is considered a prerequisite. In a conclusion, the increase in transnatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79230769231 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38506115946 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.84767155 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170868794776 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636745542378 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606930784249 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108590094443 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586490603138 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.