At present, internet plays a vital in almost every aspect of human life. As a result, traditional spectrum of meetings has also changed from in person to virtual, speaking of which, numerous commercial meetings and educational trainings are getting conducted online instead of at work places and institutes. Here, this essay intends to discuss merits of this happening outweigh demerits.
Firstly, online meetings not only save company's resources, but also work as catalyst to save the environment. For instance, while joining online meetings and training, people do not need to travel to their offices and training centers which not only saves their time, fuel and money, but also traffic congestion on roads gets reduced on a significant level. Undoubtedly, this trend is and will always be a win-win situation since it is in favor of environment, companies and employees. Therefore, it is clear why online meeting is gaining prevalence over personal meeting in current period.
However, On the other hand, some people feel less motivated while joining meeting and training sessions from their home. In such cases, there is a possibility of decrease in productivity leading to adverse effects such as poor quality of work or job dissatisfaction. For example, a recent study showed that during pandemic lockdown period, attendance with online training classes was record breaking 100% but final result was 40% which was 75% during last year with traditional classroom training. Such situation, albeit we can overcome, by strict monitoring of student's activity and involving them into group discussion at the end of training program on daily basis. Thus, it is clear that although few demerits, benefits of online meetings and training cannot be overlooked at the cost of negligible downsides.
In summary, online meetings are advantageous to both environment and human beings, especially in modern times when we are caught up with polluted environment and dying resources. Hence, merits of this technological shift outweigh demerits. As such, it is predicted that positive outcomes of online corporate meetings and educational trainings will forever be stronger than negative ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in summary, speaking of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43243243243 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85572796485 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624624624625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3529490829 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4666666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237409326425 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783961001299 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558382596646 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148574092974 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396590585233 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.