Animals rights activists are emphasizing importance of wild animal welfare policy since rapid growth of industrialization and urbanization. Even some intellectuals have raised a serious concern in this regard. The argument that wild animals should be kicked out of metropolitan areas is a subject that is both supported and refuted by many. Both sides of this argument will be analyzed before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Firstly, it is easy to see the progressive rate at which few wild species in the jungle have come on the verge of extinction. For example, today only twelve white tigers are left in the sundarban of West Bengal, which were more than a thousand a decade ago. In forest, due to the absence of Indian Forest Service surveillance, these tigers were hunted and sold in the international black market for their skin and teeth by merchants. Likewise, numerous species are killed everyday which is a legitimate concern to maintain the ecosystem. Therefore, it is easy to see why the debate of keeping wild animals in the city has garnered some support.
However, on the other side of this argument, it must be kept in consideration that if wild animals start living between humans, it would not only create chaos for citizen's safety, but those animals also would not feel comfortable in concrete jungles. For instance, according to a research done by PETA, wild lives require habitat which must not be surrounded by human population and industries in order to maintain fine balance of population for both human beings and animals. Unfortunately, it is something that life in the city can not offer. Thus, this makes is clear why the notion of keeping wild creatures out of urban areas is plausible.
In summary, both sides of the argument illustrating wild lives in the city have strong support. However, after analyzing both the camps it is clear that the idea of keeping wild animals in the town cannot be supported. As such, it is predicted that wild animal conservation act will be strictly followed in the future and harsh legal actions will be taken if someone violates the law of wild animal's protection.
- Nowadays the use of social media such as facebook twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one on one conversation Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 72
- There is a problem today that copyright materials such as music films and books are freely available on the Internet with the result that the owners of the works lose money Is this negative development or positive development 86
- Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with the police or the military Others think that women are less suitable for this kind of job Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- The world today is a safer place and government should stop spending larger amounts of money on their armed forces Do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays more and more researches are being carried out and sponsored by private organizations Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages in such cases 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
.... Likewise, numerous species are killed everyday which is a legitimate concern to mainta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ken if someone violates the law of wild animals protection.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, thus, even so, for example, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9748603352 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77043860172 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7173432588 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264090800496 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854244980709 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648247733041 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166232755054 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641490802527 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
.... Likewise, numerous species are killed everyday which is a legitimate concern to mainta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ken if someone violates the law of wild animals protection.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, thus, even so, for example, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9748603352 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77043860172 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7173432588 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264090800496 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854244980709 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648247733041 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166232755054 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641490802527 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.