There is a problem today that copyright materials such as music, films and books are freely available on the Internet with the result that the owners of the works lose money. Is this negative development or positive development?
In this technological era, copyrighted music and books are not only widely available on the internet, but also at the free of cost. Even cyber crime department has raised their concern over this top of heated debate. This essay intends to discuss potential reasons and mention this trend of freely available copyrighted content on the internet has considerable downsides rather than its perks.
Firstly, artists spend their entire life to make a piece of their individual art such as songs, music videos or movies and they earn money from that piece of art for their survival. Often their work gets uploaded unknowingly on the internet and because of that, it reaches to masses at zero cost and artists cannot earn money by selling it. For instance, a music composer hire musicians, pay them and invest money on latest instruments to record the album. Unfortunately, often the artist does not the cover the half amount he has invested on his project when his work gets available on the internet for no cost. Therefore, in many cases, they face financial crisis and failure even after putting the best efforts.
Secondly, it is commonly known even if copyrighted music is uploaded on the internet with individual's consent, their competitors or people from the same industry but from another country copy their work and do not give credits to the main author and composer. For example, taking real life example into consideration, music composer Anu Malik was proved guilty for copying and using western music into his Indian music and not giving credits to the international pop star Ricky Martin. Undoubtedly, such practice is morally wrong and by doing so, real talent does not get the acknowledgement it deserves. From this it becomes quite evident that often real talent does not get its worth even a piece of art is put on internet with artist's approval.
In summary, we discussed downsides of freely available copyrighted music and books on the internet. After analyzing this subject thoroughly, it is clear that wide range of availability of copyrighted music and novels on the internet for no charge is a negative development. As such, it is predicted that negative sides of such piracy will be forever stronger than positive ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02680965147 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65333483129 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554959785523 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5064440073 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262332837663 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960561356894 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675597263467 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181760853248 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772331728847 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.