It is true that, in this contemporary era, vehicles, clothes and more other branded items are being purchased by sizeable majority of people at an unprecedented rate in all over the world because it plays an indispensable role in everyone's life these days. However, according to my perspective, this trend has more negative impacts than positive.
To commence with, children want to purchase branded products and try to convince their parents but those families who cannot afford these products, when they refuse their children. Furthermore, a number of heinous steps are taken like kidnapping, robbery, stealing money, e.t.c, for money by teenagers. Another reason could be, many individuals start wasting their money in show-off like, sometimes they waste their money in branded thing but after that they realised that this product is available in market in cheap rates then they feel blue. To exemplify, according to a survey, it can be manifested that more than 47% of crimes are doing by teenagers who do not have enough money for purchasing branded products.
Looking at the other view, high prestigious products are a symbol of wealthyness. Moreover, if you start purchasing such products of nike, Addidas, panasonic, Gucci, Starbucks and so on. It impacts on other lifestyle. Furthermore, individuals would do hardwork after watching some advertisement and it would create great opportunity for country's economy as well as for person status. Secondly, sometimes people purchase these products because they are durable instead of any cheap products. For instance, I have changed 3 bags which I purchased from cheap market they broke down easily but since I have purchased my reebok bag, I am feeling on the nine cloud because it is superior product.
On a concluding note, undoubtedly, brands play part and parcel role in this modernised era yet, we must understand that it puts wrong impression on middle class or poor class families. Thus, they start doing wrong things for money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, as for, for instance, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22741433022 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73969783659 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638629283489 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5898579641 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178654164303 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602428153989 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301687742373 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105157721816 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025661284964 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.