Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?
Private property has been playing a vital role in human interaction in all societies. Today, fancy clothes, popular vehicles and other items are highly desired by a number of individuals. In my opinion people pursue a social status, which can be boosted by owning famous brands. Moreover, I strongly believe that this is a bane to the society.
Nowaday, social status is highly dependent on wealthyness of a person, pushing people to obtain items from companies with recognizable name and to highlight its ownership. Therefore, numerous people want to buy a limited number of brands, making the demand on the market of fancy clothes and luxury cars exceeding the supply. This allows manufacturers to increase prices making them exorbitant. For example, the Volkswagen's report states that about sixty percent of their customers in Europe purches cars under Volkswagen brand rather than Skoda brand, which are the same but thirty percent cheaper. In other words, human beings abundantly spend their income on brands to highlight their social status.
However, due to above-mentioned reason, people do not spend their resources efficiently. Money, that was spent on overpriced clothes and cars can be potentially allocated to funding research and beating poverty. Since people can obtain the same number of goods for smaller prices, they can fund various charity fonds without any restrictions on their lifestyle. Nowadays, charity aids destitute individuals to finance their medical expences, builds houses for homeless people, funds numerous universities, etc. Possesing more resources allows charity fonds to make the Earth a better place for everyone.
In conclusion, people's will to support their status in a society entails inefficient waste of income, which can be alloted to charity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46762589928 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73658511473 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651079136691 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1347529555 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207417618377 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612764839038 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036482352126 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106128653454 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591617119436 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.