Nowadays many people work part or full time from home. Some people believe that working from home has many benefits for mankind and society. Do you agree or disagree with the given statement.
It is well said that" work is worship". Thus, everyone is engaged with job in order to earn two square meal in this modern epoch. Presently, majority of masses are interested to work full or part time from home. Some folks consider that doing official work by sitting at home is supposed to be huge privilege and it brings multifarious pros for individuals and society on this universe. Here, I would like to accord with the given statement.
There are manifold points to support my point of view. First and foremost, official jobs done by people from home could be lucrative to lead relaxed and enjoyable lifestyle in this fast and furious era. To illustrate, people can perform their official work with flexibility and no need to step out from home for the work where they encounter the congestion, contamination, gridlock and noise. Hence, persons not only do outdoor activities but also prevent themselves from the inconvenience of traveling. Besides this, doing job by sitting at home allows people to bridge generations gap among family members. To justify, people working from home have adequate time to spend with family members.In this way, they can share their thoughts, feelings and ideas with each other and help in household chores. Therefore, performing official work by masses from home is a capital thought in order to develop harmonious bonding in this busiest world.
Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initially, entrepreneurs can save an insane amount of money if employees do official work from their homes. For example, there is no need to construct commercial buildings, showrooms and offices. Hence, doing jobs from home is expected to be beneficial for the financial budgets of entrepreneurs. In addition, preserving natural resources such as petrol, diesel and trees is the excellent result of doing job from home. Thence , a nation could preserve such resources for their upcoming generations. Last but not least, people can save their precious time and money if they do official work by sitting at home. To demonstrate, people who work from home do not need to waste their time in traveling and no need to make any expense on tickets. Consequently, the idea of working from home deserves appreciation and can be provided useful for individuals.
To recapitulate, there is no doubt, doing jobs by sitting at home invites few drawbacks for business firms. However, i still believe that the importance of work from home cannot be underestimated. As it is huge privilege for human being and ambience in this fast pace world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...f masses are interested to work full or part time from home. Some folks consider that doi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...quate time to spend with family members.In this way, they can share their thoughts...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ious bonding in this busiest world. Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initia...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt result of doing job from home. Thence , a nation could preserve such resources ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08274231678 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80381977031 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.250517595 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5833333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422298873037 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127313338854 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844986241901 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277189589966 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498158471736 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.