Some people believe that young employees are the most valuable for the company. However, others argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the given statement?
Working sectors have undergone substantial changes since the technology has given its presence in this era of modernization. Presently, a massive number of people opine that young blood contribute remarkably in the progress of business sectors. Thus, corporate world is progressing by leaps and bounds. By contrast, others believe that veteran grey generation is more lucrative for the bright future and success of companies. Here, I would like to accord with the former statement .
There are multifarious points to support my point of view. First and foremost, unlike old employees, youngsters are well educated, technically more advanced and more articulate and hence they can be more productive for the business firms. To illustrate, young people nowadays are engaged with prominent universities where they achieve a great deal of knowledge and experience regarding theoretical and practical skills . They can learn to operate latest machines and technical equipments whereas grey- haired employees have orthodox thinking and they often resist the use of new technology in working sectors. Adding to it, younger generation is more creative, adaptive and agile as compre to senior employees. Thence, the role of young talent is terrific in order to uplift the status of business firms.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, young people are called the backbone of a company. Young employees have strategies, tips, tricks and techniques to deal with heavy work load and welcome to new innovation, experiment whereas late adulthood workers resist such kinds of changes owing to their conventional attitude. As a result, young people are believed to be real hero in boosting the economy of companies. What is more, unlike old employees, modern generation are not only physically and mentally stronger but also has much greater work efficiency. To justify, young workers are healthy and they can work round the clock. They are passionate in showing their maximum potential at workplace in order to get promotions, awards and incentives. Consequently, such traits make them matchless and their important at workplace is the need of an hour.
To recapitulate, employees are the backbone of the business firms. Undeniably, well matured employees worthwhile for companies. However, I still believe that a firm can progress dramatically under the presence of modern employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...like to accord with the former statement . There are multifarious points to sup...
^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...garding theoretical and practical skills . They can learn to operate latest machin...
^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'operate the latest'.
Suggestion: operate the latest
...nd practical skills . They can learn to operate latest machines and technical equipments where...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...plift the status of business firms. Further emphasizing on my point of view, young ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...eal with heavy work load and welcome to new innovation, experiment whereas late adulthood work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, still, then, thus, well, whereas, while, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47826086957 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89246773757 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58152173913 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3019441768 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224672388637 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587082240841 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411358501975 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136272102852 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00740367775559 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.