Research is essential for growth of any specific factor, by undertaking research on any topic, detailed information is obtained on the subject which could be utilised for its improvement. In some underdeveloped nations the work of research is not given high weightage by the government, in such scenario various private organisations initiate to carry research on their respective topics in order to gain advantage from it. Hence, this essay will intend to discuss merits of private researches undertaken and how it outweighs demerits.
Government often rejects research requests of scholars, explaining lack of funds being the reason. For instance, last year according to Research reports published by central body, only 2 new topics were included in national research list stating, water management research and findings to be carried out for data on renewable energy sources utilised by the country. Due to this individuals/ organisations interested in other topics sponsor it by themselves, as a result of which record of research topics is not maintained and people are unaware of this area of work, creating a demerit. Hence, it could be said that research on private level is not much known by people and scholars do not receive reward in return as government does not acknowledge private researches.
There are numerous advantages of the same. People are not bound to research topics due to which facts and figures important to change are known as well as such researches not only benefit individual/organisation but impacts on huge mass by its positive findings. For example, last week an archaeological research of an Egyptian archaeologist was telecasted live, his discovery of 2500 old mummy coffins were unwrapped, through these research report it was easy to find out substances used in pre-historic time for body preservation, which can now be utilised for different required purpose. Additionally, by such work organisations can gain recognition too. Overall, although with some demerits, merits of private research cannot be overlooked, with a negligible downside.
To recapitulate, positive sides of private research by individual/organisation proves to be beneficial, rather than depending upon government body to do everything. Thus, the idea of encouragement to personal researches is plausible. As such it is predicted that in upcoming future number of researches shall increase considerably and recognition would be given to the deserving ones.
- Nowadays the use of social media such as facebook twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one on one conversation Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Nowadays more and more researches are being carried out and sponsored by private organizations Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages in such cases 84
- Nowadays larger distances are traveled by people to work and study on a daily basis Some consider it to be a negative development while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
- Some people believe that teachers have an important role to play in the educational success while others think that it is the students attitude that matters Discuss both views and share your opinion 89
- The diagram below shows changes in modes of transport chosen by travellers in a Europen country from 1950 to 1990
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sources utilised by the country. Due to this individuals/ organisations interested i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'archaeological research'.
Suggestion: archaeological research
...sitive findings. For example, last week an archaeological research of an Egyptian archaeologist was telec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... last week an archaeological research of an Egyptian archaeologist was telecasted...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2096.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50131233596 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31500323121 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566929133858 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7517618851 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.733333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253281645898 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924269667857 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347391985285 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170570561581 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182376221352 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.