Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?
Hitherto, globalization has led to the interference of science technology, and the question of whether robots workers bring human beings benefits or not has been appealing public concerning. While many people agree that automatics employees can help people a lot, I completely gravitate toward the latter opinion by giving some rational evidence.
It is conspicuous that the number of works in this day and age is increasing, urban workers are facing tons of deadlines day by day, so a robot can partly reduce working pressures. However, this credo may lead to a lazy generation, seldom do people finish their tasks by themselves while they can utilize the power of technology. A vivid example is that kids at school can now be able to use apps on their phones to solve exams, and many of them finished their test without obstacles, they can solve even the toughest one due to the AI; therefore, the prevailing score will no longer rate students ability. The more flourishing the robot industry is, the more danger the human can face with.
On the other hand, there are tons of foreseeable drawbacks that the automatics machine industry can create. There was salient news on TV discussing Tesla company, which was going to introduce the first robot that can work as well as a professional and experient people, because of the development of technology, this robot also had different types of emotion. This news posed a thread to tons of people who are unemployed due to the effect of Coronaviruses. Further and more importantly, when Tesla can create a huge number of robots that can not be attacked by Covid, these machines can replace prevailing workers, so that will increase unemployed rates in the whole world.
In conclusion, unless the civilization reaches the pinnacle of development, the robot can not be used customarily in daily life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...interference of science technology, and the question of whether robots workers bring human beings benef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78433783043 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605177993528 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9444646567 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.454545455 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188793684615 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711110457884 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455296215172 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106997950893 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437767201641 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.