in their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways. Why is this? Do you think this is a positive or negative development.
Hitherto, the dramatic globalization has led to an increase in the quality of products advertising, and questions of the ground purpose for this development and whether this evolution brings our society benefits or drawbacks have been raising public attention. While many people lament that this is absolutely the negative development, I will overlook these lucrativeness by giving some rational reasons.
Let’s go back into the pass to see what inspired human beings to make this revolution. When the manufacture market was in saturated period, many businesses made effort to have customers’ appealing which can create more income and resilient after the economic unstable time. By that target, they tried to advertise via traditional ways like: In America, there was a campaign of bringing new items directly to customers’ accommodation where the rate of buying products is the highest or making banners. But they soon realized that customers are always be interested by new useful products, so advertising their goods as the newest on the world was the uppermost way to sell items.
On the one hand, this advertising method may put the businesses’ economic in danger. There is a fact that the new items can vanish prevailing goods from selling market, for example: The world witnessed the decrease in American's stocks a few years ago, there was an economic crisis due to the excess of domestic products in their houses, therefore, the price of those items dropped significantly and create a sluggish developing period in this nation. Furthermore, the latest not means the best, it seem like resident realized this in long time ago, although many high-tech products are introduced in selling field, there are tons of foreseeable drawbacks in these items. Conspicuously, one of the most vivid evidences is that the house cleaning robot, this machine can make residents’ houses become clean without consuming human physical strength, however, it super slow and unnecessary because human can do it faster and cleaner.
In conclusion, the demand for new products in the manufacture market is expanding, however, we must carried out the survey of whether this goods can appeal human’s interest or not before introduce it to citizens
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Hitherto, the dramatic globalization has...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 353, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this lucrativeness' or 'these lucrativenesses'?
Suggestion: this lucrativeness; these lucrativenesses
...e negative development, I will overlook these lucrativeness by giving some rational reasons. Let’s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et, for example: The world witnessed the decrease in Americans stocks a few years...
^^
Line 6, column 499, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...more, the latest not means the best, it seem like resident realized this in long tim...
^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... must carried out the survey of whether this goods can appeal human’s interest or no...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31652661064 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85927859979 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.2107773062 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.545454545 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4545454545 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260068624671 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943640159334 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379559541402 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147935950654 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339627557509 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.