Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Hitherto, the globalization has consequence a variety of entertaining ways, and the question of whether reading books bring children more benefits than using high-tech devices or not has been raising public attention. While some people lament that the modern way is better, I oppose this view by giving some rational evidences.
First and foremost, imagination boost is one of book’s benefits that we can not ignore. On science view, the Concrete operational stage of development of kids is critical, so children must have rational way to increase imagination skill. By reading book, they can stand on many character’s perspectives, which makes children not only understand the story deeply but also force them to abstract-drawing a picture of the book. Although applying modern technologies into films and games, it still too pragmatic for kids to fully understand the story and badly affect their cognitive development.
On the other hand, health problems are also taken into consider. A survey in the UK identify that kids who prefer reading book to playing computer games or watching Tv are less likely to have eyes and heart illness. It is conspicuous that the blue light coming from technology devices can damage kid’s health and lead to some foreseeable consequences in future, while book is the opposite. Furthermore, scientist also point out that children can remember more details by reading book than using modern entertainment.
In conclusion, reading book is better for kids than using high-tech ways
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...nce a variety of entertaining ways, and the question of whether reading books bring children more benef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d lead to some foreseeable consequences in future, while book is the opposite. Furthermor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etter for kids than using high-tech ways
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32780082988 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90376989729 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634854771784 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1177529667 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.727272727 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275029198889 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969073758899 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639026364595 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171688907961 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366101419293 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.