in their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways. Why is this? Do you think this is a positive or negative development.
Hitherto, dramatic globalization has resulted in an increase in the quality of product advertising, raising questions about the purpose of this development and whether this evolution brings our society benefits or drawbacks. While many people lament that this is an absolutely negative development, I will overlook this lucrativeness by giving some rational reasons.
Let’s go back into the past to see what inspired human beings to create this revolution. When the manufacturing market was saturated, many businesses made an effort to gain customers so that they could generate more income and be more resilient after the economic downturn. They attempted to advertise in traditional ways, such as: in America, there was a campaign for bringing new items directly to customers' lodgings where the rate of purchasing products is the highest, or making banners. they soon realized that customers were always interested in new useful products, so advertising their goods as the newest in the world was the uppermost way to sell items.
On the one hand, this advertising method may put businesses’ economies in danger. There is a possibility that the new items can vanish prevailing goods from selling market due to the new goods, for example: The world witnessed a decrease in American stocks a few years ago. There was an economic crisis due to the excess of domestic products in their houses. Therefore, the prices of those items dropped significantly and created a sluggish development period in this nation. Furthermore, it appeared that the newest is not simply the best , it seem like resident realized this in long time ago, although many high-tech products are introduced in selling field, there are tons of foreseeable drawbacks in these items. Conspicuously, one of the most vivid evidences is that the house cleaning robot, this machine can make residents’ houses become clean without requiring human physical strength, however, it extremely slow and unnecessary because human can do it faster and cleaner.
To summarize, the demand for new products in the manufacturing market is increasing. However, before introducing these goods to citizens, we must conduct a survey to determine whether or not these goods are appealing to humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ucts is the highest, or making banners. they soon realized that customers were alway...
^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d that the newest is not simply the best , it seem like resident realized this in ...
^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
... the newest is not simply the best , it seem like resident realized this in long tim...
^^^^
Line 3, column 917, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'slows'?
Suggestion: slows
...hysical strength, however, it extremely slow and unnecessary because human can do it...
^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
..., we must conduct a survey to determine whether or not these goods are appealing to humans.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32584269663 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92105159638 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7027299927 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261813066907 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845903854061 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478107978028 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140803337025 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640013944607 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.