Nowadays, people always throw the old things away when they buy new things, some people claim that the broken things should be repaired and used again. What factors cause this phenomennon? What effects this phenomennon leads to?
In the modern world, among a number of issues people have to deal with, environmental pollution is one of them and along with it arises something more specific - malfunctioned and used items are frequently discarded or substituted with new ones instead of replacement or reuse. Within the scope of this writing, a number of reasons will be discussed and from then impacts will be mentioned.
As the beginning part of this discussion, causes are worth mentioning initially. In this way, we can see that advances in technology increase need of purchase of customers. In detail, most of new products, nowadays, are more modern and long-lasting, which makes people want to buy them rather than repairing broken items to use again. For example, smartphone manufacturers continually bring to market new products with great designs and outstanding features. Some people who do not want to be outdated have to follow this trend and buy new smart phones although their phone are still working quite well. Additionally, the cause to this matter can be found in the fact that the problem is caused by consumerism. Specifically, advertisements encourage buyers to consume goods with promotion and home warranty. To illustrate, when new semester is coming, FPT shops usually have promotion program for freshmen and the shop is also ready to provide free guarantees. Therefore, most students easily decide to buy a new laptop for study instead of reusing an old laptop. Lastly, we can see that population growth makes a lot of young men have a tendency to buy smart furniture to optimize the living space. Take an example, using a smart bed which can be folded up simply is the most effective solution because this can help a family save living space with ensuring convenience in a small apartment.
There will undoubtedly be some negative consequences if people always purchase new goods without making use of old things. This is to say, this phenomenon causes environmental pollution. When removing the old things, it means that people will throw away a number of rubbish to the environment. The amount of garbage discharged into the environment is raising. Furthermore, the more factories will be established to product merchandise, the more pollutant will be released. There can be a rise in the number of carbon footprint emitted into the nature, which can definitely the current climate change. These results in human's illness such as cancers or lung problems. In addition, a look further into other consequences for natural resources. This is to say, people have to exploit a big proportion of metal such as lead, copper, coal... in order to develop the industry.
In conclusion, some causes of this problem can be identified and the serious effects on society must not be underestimated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-09 | vishal sachdeva | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | Tạ Tiểu Nhật | 78 | view |
- The chat below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 to 2000 61
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 67
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in particular European country in 1958 and in 2008 67
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, lastly, look, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 457.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09628008753 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89740952917 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566739606127 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4251821255 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0416666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0416666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255895981273 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701969911321 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593958027089 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157113504381 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441408554816 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.