Nowadays the people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
With the advancement in technology, it certainly altered the way in which an individual can communicates with other. It has affected relationship in various ways, and in my opinion, there are some positive and negative effects.
In the era of rapidly evolving technology, people can easily talk with their loved ones from any part of the world due to social applications like Facebook, viber and whatsapp. They can also get to know every information and activity of their friends by using these apps. Furthermore, technology has also left a remarkable effect on the business and educational sectors. For instance, a company owner can easily contacts and plans their group meetings with their employees on internet using skype for business. In terms of schooling system, a student can learn their videos lessons from a teacher in a different city or a country.
On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Connection between one people to another was very difficult when technology was limited and at that time, only way to communicate with each other were telegrams and written letters. However, nowadays within seconds we can access face to face with other using video calls. On the other hand, technology has become now available on our hands by means of smartphones which cause us to spend a lot of time on social sites and as a result it weakens our family ties. We are not able to give proper time to our parents by wasting too much time on the instagram, snapcaht and other entertainment apps.
To recapitulate, technology has definitely break a huge communication barrier between one person to another but not all of these changes have positive outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Florah | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | nhaxquyeen | 89 | view |
- The government’s investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extend do u agree with this statement. 73
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Government should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 82
- The big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- The chart below gives the information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 89
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents better parenting skills. To what extend do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'contact'
Suggestion: contact
...or instance, a company owner can easily contacts and plans their group meetings with the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acher in a different city or a country. On the one hand, these developments can ...
^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'broken'.
Suggestion: broken
...recapitulate, technology has definitely break a huge communication barrier between on...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, second, so, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02142857143 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80941383966 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7001561687 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.153846154 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22489669128 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709735053217 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564035148145 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133933937815 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672469821831 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.