People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching T.V. To what extent do you agree?
It is a common belief that having good reading ability helps to increase our thinking and language skills rather than watching T.V. Although, I agree that the reading skills prove to be fruitful for cognitive skills. I reckon that technology also plays a tremendous role to build our thoughts in a precise way.
On the one hand, reading a book is pivotal for the development of our creative minds because we are able to learn plenty of technical ideas as well as moral values and try to express these things in our practical life to become more successful. Many people believe that it is a fun and thrill to read different kinds of books and get diverse knowledge from it. Furthermore, it becomes a building block in the enhancement of our mental abilities. Also, it is very easy to understand variety of languages as many writers and linguistics convey their meanings in a simple way which is easily understand by individuals. They used the pronunciations and phrases in their contents that everyone can get the command in its particular language.
On the other hand, modern technology has contributed a significant part in our personal growth as nowadays many individuals spend their leisure time on watching television and surfing on the internet to keep themselves update about the current situation. Moreover, they can get to know about different culture and tradition. It is also very difficult to get expertise in a language without listening and speaking skills and it is only possible by watching the television. For example, according to many professional ielts trainer, BBC is the one of the best source which favors the students to achieve good bands in listening, speaking and reading skills.
To recapitulate, I agree that people embrace a lot of skills from books but at the same time, television also improves our positive imaginations and communication abilities but we also must select appropriate programs and watch them proportionally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a precise way" with adverb for "precise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...a tremendous role to build our thoughts in a precise way. On the one hand, reading a book is pi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 558, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s and linguistics convey their meanings in a simple way which is easily understand by individua...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 590, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'understood'.
Suggestion: understood
...eanings in a simple way which is easily understand by individuals. They used the pronuncia...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i reckon, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07120743034 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91802522688 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3637126027 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163995864652 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544705848568 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697581017895 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111187980757 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552543350888 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.