Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing. Why do you think it is happening? How can this problem be solved?
The expense of public transport have increased gradually in recent years. There are variety reasons for it and also, there are some solution for reducing these costs. This essay will survey these subjects.
There are several reasons for raising cost of public transport. Firstly, unbalancing between supply and demand can be had effect on prices. This means that, on the one side because of increasing population and overcrowded streets, people rather to utilize from public transport, on the other hand, the shortage of public transport such as bus and train, persuade government decision makers to raise prices in order to reduce using from these devices. Secondly, the increase of vehicle production expense in the factory, and maintenance costs can affect on price of transport. For example, if price of fuel or tire raise, it is natural for drivers that increase the price of fares.
Moreover, there are several solutions for reducing or holding constant price of transport. Investing of transport system can help to this subject. If the number of these devises increase, it can create balance between supply and demand. As a result of this action, personal car in street decrease, overcrowded in street reduce and also, the price of transport decline gradually. Another solution is that, the government given subsidies to companies for producing of public transports such as train and bus and likewise for consumable parts such as tire and also for fuels in order to reduce maintenance for driver. Consequently, when expense decline for driver, the price of transport also, decrease gently.
To sum up, we should accept that if the governments not given facilities such as subsidy for reduce the cost of producing public transport, or for investing these devices, the price of public transport raised continuously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... the factory, and maintenance costs can affect on price of transport. For example, if pri...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29794520548 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6503309381 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510273972603 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.0731170309 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.133333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201769741854 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089159940576 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042424178608 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139552197341 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456591436157 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.