Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras).In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
With the advent of technology, these days people are being surveilled through cellphone tracking and security cameras and many of them do not know about it which is going on. In my opinion, it has both merits and demerits.
There are many reasons why it is necessary. The first reason is that it is beneficial for the safety of masses, By knowing the local activities, the authorities are better able to guarantee their security and save people from any attack. For example, many bombings can be prevented through proper checks and better surveillance. Another reason is that If bureaucracy knows the feelings of their inhabitants, they will be able to set better laws for them. For instance, foreign and local policies are being made according to the wishes of people of their country. As a result, there will be no strike occur which may help the country to progress further. Therefore, it is essential to monitor them for their own survival.
On the other hand, many people think that it has many drawbacks. Firstly, breach of privacy of individuals of which they not know is a criminal offence. No one has the right to surveillance them without their consent because they are not criminals. Secondly, if education is adequate, there will be no need of doing monitoring such as in the most developed city, like Sweden, security cameras are very limited. Hence, it is cleared that it is also some issue.
In conclusion, with the advancement in technology, tracking of people activities secretly is become a normal routine of the government with very little awareness in people and according to me, it has both uses and uselessness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93140794224 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7028068616 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8372946897 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3091034299 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091665892094 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796098746485 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179930212404 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490057291432 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.