In the modern era, the issue of media reports and news highly controversial due to their choices. There has been a remarkable increase in the number of people who believe that to focus on problems instead of positive developments is perilous for both society and citizens. This essay will delve both sides of this view before drawing a reasonable conclusion. In my opinion, media employees such as journalists or TV channel reporters should be balanced concerning their reports.
Admittedly, after decades of speculation, sociologists now have fairly accurate information concerning the negative effects of watching or reading bad news on society and people. Perhaps the main disadvantage of this situation is that problems and emergencies might create detrimental effects on individuals’ psychology through media. A good illustration of this is that citizens who suffer from anxiety become more bored, depressed and even isolated owing to these news. Secondly, if media focus on problems rather than positive news, the productivity of society might decrease, which in turn leads to social problems, such as lack of communication. Thus, media managers should be prudent concerning their main subjects because this situation might be perilous on not only individuals but also society.
Despite these arguments, benefits of focus on reality should not be underestimated. The primary reason why media ought to be focus on problems is that citizens can easily cope with complex issues thanks to these real news. According to a report published by BBC Turkey, people who live in Istanbul listen to radio in order to learn about traffic jam on the the main bridge. Even though the traffic jam is a serious problem, it should not be underestimated by the media. Furthermore, if economy channels provide more accurate information concerning the economy, managers spend money on more appropriate sectors. Hence, positive aspects of focus on emergencies and problems cannot be denied.
In conclusion, my personal view is that media should not focus on neither problems nor positive developments. These areas should be balanced by media employees and managers. However, it must be said that the decision as to whether which side of this view is more useful must be taken in the context of the entire society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be balanced concerning their reports. Admittedly, after decades of speculation...
^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...d, depressed and even isolated owing to these news. Secondly, if media focus on problems r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... in order to learn about traffic jam on the the main bridge. Even though the traffic ja...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... in order to learn about traffic jam on the the main bridge. Even though the traffic ja...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ever, it must be said that the decision as to whether which side of this view is more useful ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92830920061 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6940012943 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197236972898 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685590555759 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555902574131 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126436997832 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172483822439 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.