Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
It is true that many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. I totally agree, because it has more positive rather than negative development for several reason.
In the one hand, the positive development of this essay is any job or activities being easier to do. It is because technology perhaps help people to manage data. For example, data analysis always using technology application such as SPSS or ArcGIS. SPSS is data analysis application for managing, counting, and grouping data. It uses number as a database. ArcGIS is using for spatial analysis. Imagery data as a database. As result, data analysis can be done quickly. So that, technology more helping people to interact each other.
However, there are the negative developments of people interact has changed because of technology. Firstly, it makes people being unsocialized. It is because people didn’t need having meet each other. For example, there was a meeting held by HDR in one of company. Employee is in other country so meeting would be held by online. Although the meeting has done, but I think it doesn’t going work as well because some value was ignored like first appearance. Secondly, technology sometimes create awful fellowship expecially for teenager. It is because teenager prefer to exploring anything without knowing the benefit. For example, watching a bad video in youtube channel. Teenager like to imitate something new even it will harm their friends. So that, negative development of technology can be more effect consider on its user.
From where I stand, I believe that many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. Technology affected the online of relationships people make. If you are using internet, I suggest to separate some channel to watch.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...ve rather than negative development for several reason. In the one hand, the positive deve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'doesn't' requires base form of this verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...eeting has done, but I think it doesn’t going work as well because some value was ign...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'explore'?
Suggestion: explore
...nager. It is because teenager prefer to exploring anything without knowing the benefit. F...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest separating'.
Suggestion: suggest separating
...ople make. If you are using internet, I suggest to separate some channel to watch.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22068965517 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73336716818 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548275862069 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3009794041 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.56 106.682146367 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.6 20.7667163134 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.12 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372186093289 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11009526322 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127144742022 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273284497572 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860102392095 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.81 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.