Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative develop ment.
In the advanced pace world, technology plays a crucial role in society. Several individuals interact with other has replaced owing to their busy schedule and electronic gadgets. There are various factors discuss in the upcoming paragraphs and provide some possible solutions. I believe that it is a negative development.
Commencing with the most prominent reason that why automation is affecting the relations of human beings relations. Firstly, the main reason is the busy lifestyle of pupils. Individuals are working for longer hours so, they do not have enough time to spend with their families. Secondly, when they have free time they use electronic gadgets such as surfing the internet, playing video games, etc. rather than building new relations. For instance, in lockdown children stay at their home and don't go outside in parks for playing games and lost their many friends and relations. Thus, connections are affected.
However,in ancient times when there is no technology, relations are very strong but due to ,advancement the divorces are also increasing gradually. Old peoples are living in joint big families together because there is no much infrastructure in ancient times. While now people are living in nuclear families and individuals have no free time to build up new relations. Hence, automation is affecting the relationships of every pupil gradually.
In the conclusion, technology is the main reason which now affects the personal connections and relations with their families or other ones. Whilst, in my opinion, has a negative impact on our community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orld, technology plays a crucial role in society. Several individuals interact wi...
^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...automation is affecting the relations of human beings relations. Firstly, the mai...
^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ockdown children stay at their home and dont go outside in parks for playing games a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...s, connections are affected. However,in ancient times when there is no technolo...
^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gy, relations are very strong but due to ,advancement the divorces are also increa...
^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... big families together because there is no much infrastructure in ancient times. W...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h infrastructure in ancient times. While now people are living in nuclear familie...
^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es or other ones. Whilst, in my opinion, has a negative impact on our community.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38554216867 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83669489974 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622489959839 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1458981291 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8823529412 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6470588235 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136981667689 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404509368775 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388838618842 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896786711126 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035616283535 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.