Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
These days, by virtue of dominant innovations and developments in technology, communication between people hereby has changed, which has both positive and negative aspects. I feel this way for some reasons and I will explore in this following essay.
Years ago, without Internet or digital goods, we used to go out, meet face-to-face and thereby make acquaintance of one another. Gradually, we would connect closer, as well as the distance between different individual in a society had been abridged. Yet, in this up-to-date and present-day world, people are inclined to make friends through social media, such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. By means of modern technology, they can effortlessly interact, notwithstanding the geographical distance. Besides, it has become much easier since we could have conversations with everyone anywhere, anytime while being in the comfort of our zone. As a result, we have a chance to get access to a wide circle of relationships with all kind of people.
Nevertheless, technology has also brought several drawbacks for those who interact virtual world on a regular and long-term basis. In specific, employing technological devices may be conducive to health-damaging diseases, such as obesity, heart attack, stroke. Additionally, in the near future, humans might refuse to talk face-to-face on account of getting used to contact via social networking sites, as well as being addicted to technology.
Undoubtedly, even though technology has offered lớp of benefits regarding our relationships, there is a great deal of unhelpfulnesses, which is directly harmful to ourselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovations and developments in technology, communication between people hereby has ...
^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...between people hereby has changed, which has both positive and negative aspects. ...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... through social media, such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. By means of modern...
^^
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... relationships with all kind of people. Nevertheless, technology has also brough...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alth-damaging diseases, such as obesity, heart attack, stroke. Additionally, in t...
^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s well as being addicted to technology. Undoubtedly, even though technology has ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here is a great deal of unhelpfulnesses, which is directly harmful to ourselves. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, i feel, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56451612903 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27005936359 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713709677419 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8260126444 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196573819543 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580176651017 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460401151666 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102522056555 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740792856612 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.