Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development
thanks to the advanced technology, the methods of communication and interaction between people have changed. One of these changes is the type of relationships people form nowadays. Overall, despite some disadvantages of relationships made online, I believe that they have brought about positive development.
while people in the past resorted to their relatives, neighbours, classmates and co-workers to make relationships, those who belong to the contemporary era have expanded their circles of friends, thanks to the internet. Relations between people have expanded to involve others who reside in the other half of the globe. Thousands of miles distances are no longer an obstacle to making friends from various backgrounds and cultures as there are a wide range of options facilitated demolishing these barriers. For example, in today's world, people enjoy a variety of social websites as well as applications meant for communication such as Facebook, Twitter, Whatsapp, Line, to name but a few. As a result, a new kind of relationships has emerged, which is remote friends.
Although technology has led to a number of negatives in this respect, I would argue that the benefits, by and large, outweigh these drawbacks. A primary downside is that people currently do not have to go out in order to contact their friends in-person, instead, they tend to chat with others online. Face-to-face communication is more advantageous than online interaction in terms of developing better social skills and the potential to have some physical activities together such as walking while talking. On the other hand, communication through the world wide Web has enabled people to keep in touch with others of different languages, traditions and cultures. this has resulted in a deeper understanding and tolerance between nations, which is a valuable goal needed in today's globalised world. In addition, technology means that people can now widen their knowledge about the world via contacting non-locals, and it provides them with an opportunity to learn non-native languages simply by practising these with their remote friends online.
In conclusion, the unprecedentedly advanced technology, particularly the internet, that people enjoy now has opened the door to make remote relationships, discover the world and keep in touch with others with ease. Even though this kind of relationships has few negatives, to me, the merits brought are more significant. If this technology had not been developed, people would neither have enjoyed wide circles of friends nor broadened their knowledge about the world and the different cultures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thanks
thanks to the advanced technology, the methods...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...brought about positive development. while people in the past resorted to their re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 666, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ent languages, traditions and cultures. this has resulted in a deeper understanding ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1048, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these with their remote friends online. In conclusion, the unprecedentedly advan...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47665847666 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07967591954 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1443590786 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.117647059 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262656164736 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086711944676 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513154548295 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172745355061 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351742384189 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.