As the number of cars increases, more money has to spend on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion.
It is true that the increase in the number of cars leads to more budget required to improve road systems. While some people believe that the cost of road construction should be paid by the government, I would argue that it is better to charge car users.
On the one hand, there are two reasons why some people think that the government should bear this expenditure. First, citizens pay tax to form the government’s budget, which requires the government to allocate the money back for transport infrastructure so as to improve the living standards of citizens. Building more roads or broaden existing roads could lessen traffic congestions, and help citizens commute more easily. Second, in some countries, car buyers have already paid an exorbitant amount of tax to own and drive a car on the streets. Hence, it seems unfair to charge car owners for building roads. For example, the tax imposed on cars can account for up to 50% of car prices in Vietnam.
On the other hand, I believe that the cost of improving road systems should be incurred by car owners. One reason is that this cost could discourage citizens to own private cars, and they prefer to use public transport, such as buses or trains, to travel. This tendency will help to restrain the increase of cars on the roads, tackling traffic congestion and air pollution in major cities. Additionally, people have to pay for their consumption of water, electricity or gas, so roads are no different from any other public utility. Governments will then be able to prioritize expenditure on health and education.
In conclusion, the government should not provide public subsidies to maintain and improve road systems. Otherwise, the user should be made to pay.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...money back for transport infrastructure so as to improve the living standards of citizen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, then, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94845360825 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7436241899 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1802815123 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334887251752 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111259749588 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612206010732 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215452559764 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506847672066 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.