Now-a-days, transportation has made life easier for daily commuters. In recent study, people prefer to travel more on Railways than the other public transports. Some say it is essential to invest on new rail line, while others think to improve public transports. Let us discuss about the same.
On one hand, there are several reasons for government to invest in new projects as it will make commuting faster to different cities. People generally travel for work to different cities in their daily routine, sitting in the train would be much better than going on bus or by car. It will straight away reduce pollution and emission on fuel. Travelling in train is a cheapest mode of transportation than the other modes.
On the other hand, it's necessary to repair Public transports and roads. Improvement in Infrastructure would help in goods transportation and supply easier. Incidence of road accidents would reduce by imposing of less redlight and traffic. Renovation of railway line and widening of highways would give more safety to drivers. For example, Metro station subway would be cleaned and security system should be imposed for commuters safety.
In my opinion, government should invest both new and old mode of transport as both are part of the country. Upgrading and modernising things both are a necessity in todays world. Every person cannot afford every mode of transport in any country as it depends on the pocket of every person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is essential to invest on new rail line, while others think to improve public tra...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally travel for work to different cities in their daily routine, sitting in the t...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...mission on fuel. Travelling in train is a cheapest mode of transportation than th...
^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...novation of railway line and widening of highways would give more safety to drive...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, Metro station subway would be cleaned and security system should be imposed fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1129707113 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72341550253 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606694560669 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9440708156 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.375 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9375 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218735080934 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650210308117 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562888936168 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125191693807 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444872260807 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.