In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport.
In the world full of flurry and road congestion public transport represents the way of future. While for some it is important to expend a significant amount of money on constructing new railway lines for fast trains, it is still a contentious matter. Proponents argue that money should be spent to ameliorate existing public transport. Investing in both fast trains and public transportation is required and desirable.
High speed trains between cities will benefit the commuters as well as the people traveling for other purposes. Inter city travel for work is often time consuming and tiring which sometimes have detrimental impact on person's job. As an example, i used to drive out of of city everyday for work which was more frustrating than the work itself therefore, i end up losing my job. Less time to commute thus would be more relaxeable and convenient. Also in today's world people are always in haste. Express railways will thus let people to reach their respective destinations be it work, wedding or any family occasion in less time. Rail communication can connect cities and towns that build better communication system.
However, investing on overhauling the existing public transport would also be worthwhile. Firstly, it will tackle the nuisance caused by traffic congestion. Decrease in traffic jams in turn will reduce the proportion of people suffering from debilitating diseases due to emission of carbon monoxide by combustion of petrol. Secondly, individuals will prefer buses and metros over personal conveyance if their quality would improve because afterall they are cheaper and affordable. To illustrate, in India more people use private cars and bikes compared to public transport because lack of facilities provided by them. Therefore, money should be spent to foster the development of buses and metros.
To reciprocate, spending to establish new rails and improving existing modes of transportation is hence serviceable. Both these options will ease public life and traffic and time related issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...l impact on persons job. As an example, i used to drive out of of city everyday f...
^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...job. As an example, i used to drive out of of city everyday for work which was more ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...example, i used to drive out of of city everyday for work which was more frustrating th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o drive out of of city everyday for work which was more frustrating than the work...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...trating than the work itself therefore, i end up losing my job. Less time to comm...
^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
... if their quality would improve because afterall they are cheaper and affordable. To ill...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35202492212 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86846707778 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616822429907 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0616192483 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4210526316 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8947368421 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308624307613 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894846827464 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861545977448 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187604245244 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112594147325 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.