In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th

Some people believe that should be given much more prioritised to building the new railways lines for quick trains in cities. Whilts other disagree and argued that train wouldn't be comfortable for a short travel so that should be spent money on develop a public transport.

On the one hand, train would be benifited for faster and cheper travel. Moreover, it is much more comfortable way for travel and tranport in long route than public transport. By the railways that would be possible to carry and the large proportion of goods and passengers in short time. For instance, to send the goods into Mumbai to New Delhi, that will take longest time and highest cost by public transport, but it can be possible to arrive this thing in New Delhi in to much lowest time and cost.

On the on hand, in many disagree and feel that railways wouldn't be comfortable in short route so money should be spent on to develop the roads. Large proportion of short travel would be depend on public transport. Meanwhile, government should be give also prioritised on road transport in order to covered the shorter routes of town and places by the roads. However, public transport is one of the best way for short travel and transport on ordinary people, they can travel on their own choice. For instance, in our countries Nepal, it is landlord countries it should be carry the lots of short routes in rural areas, in here public transport is one of the best solution for travel.

To sum up, that would be hugly cheper and faster by the transport in railways, however, I think railways that would be difficult to handle the demand of short routes so public transport would be one of the best solution for that.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ts other disagree and argued that train wouldnt be comfortable for a short travel so th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'public transport'.
Suggestion: public transport
...o that should be spent money on develop a public transport. On the one hand, train would be ben...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'take the longest'.
Suggestion: take the longest
...ods into Mumbai to New Delhi, that will take longest time and highest cost by public transpo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...le to arrive this thing in New Delhi in to much lowest time and cost. On the on...
^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...in many disagree and feel that railways wouldnt be comfortable in short route so money ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'carried'?
Suggestion: carried
..., it is landlord countries it should be carry the lots of short routes in rural areas...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, i think, in short, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69565217391 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40589370409 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421404682274 0.561755894193 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1654411609 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295092510292 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135373351265 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727205764835 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221293959726 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991898365827 0.056905535591 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.