In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the modern era, transportation has become an essential part of everyday life. It is often said that the government should invest a huge amount of money in building new railway system between cities; however, others believe that it is better to allocate national budget to upgrade present public transport. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and provide an overall opinion.
There is a wide range of reasons why people believe that cities need new roads for high-speed trains. Perhaps the main reason are in favour of the construction of new railways is that it enhances the economic growth. This is because fast trains can transport a large amount of goods between cities quickly, which reduces transport cost. A further point in favour of building new railway systems is that it can reduce traffic jams in cities. The main reason for this is that unlike buses, locomotives carry hundreds or even thousands of passengers; therefore, it reduces the number of private vehicles that people use.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for the idea that government budget should be used to improve public transport. The primary reason for this is that it is cheaper than new railway system construction. For example, the authority may repair the old buses and install them with modern technology equipment at an affordable price, while the government pay large sums of money to construct new railway system. Secondly, it reduces air pollution. This is because people may use high-quality public transport instead of driving their own vehicles, which leads to a decrease in the volume of cars and motorbikes.
In conclusion, this is a topic which raises strong passions on both sides of the argument. Having considered both sides of the issue, I would argue that it is necessary to use national budget to improve the current public transport infrastructure. If the public transport becomes better and safer, it can reduce traffic congestion to a great extent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09174311927 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66315735759 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6311050152 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304760866755 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891884893244 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584620571215 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176990372815 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369214361028 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.