Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
One of the most topical issues in modern society is sharing information in scientific experiment, trade and the academic setting. it is often said that sharing information in these fields has several advantages; however, others feel that having limited access to the information is better. this essay will examine both sides of the argument and provide an overall opinion.
there are a wide range of reasons why people believe that sharing information related to scientific investigation, business and educational world benefits the community. Perhaps the main reason for this is that it is a valuable source of knowledge for everyone, especially autodidacts. For instance, when a lecturer assign students projects, they can search for information on the Internet; therefore, they can complete their assignments easily. Furthermore, it can motivate other people work harder to make the world better. For example, if researchers publish information about new vaccine, doctors will try to produce this vaccine based on the information in order to minimize some infectious diseases.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for the idea that some information is so precious that it should not be available in public. The primary reason for this is that many researchers may devote their life to do researches on a subject. Hence, they should protect their intellectual achievement. Secondly, some people may misuse the information. An example for this is that if a company share information about their products freely, other competitors might misuse the data to produce similar goods, which makes this company face lots of difficulties to compete against their rivals.
In conclusion, this is a topic which raises strong passions on both sides of the argument. having considered both sides of the issue, I would argue that a finite amount of information should be shared. if everyone respect other people’s work, there will be no longer worry about sharing information in public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...riment, trade and the academic setting. it is often said that sharing information ...
^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ed access to the information is better. this essay will examine both sides of the ar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment and provide an overall opinion. there are a wide range of reasons why pe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...and provide an overall opinion. there are a wide range of reasons why people ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o minimize some infectious diseases. Despite these arguments, there is also a...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies to compete against their rivals. In conclusion, this is a topic which rai...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...passions on both sides of the argument. having considered both sides of the issue, I w...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...amount of information should be shared. if everyone respect other people's wo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43450479233 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89581322997 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5563810124 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294035042935 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956020465685 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672807181453 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179992204439 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239783297347 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.