In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving public transport
In many countries, people suggest constructing new railway lines for speedy trains to interconnect cities, while others worry about the cost it involves and prefer for upgradation of existing public transport systems. This essay will suggest strict timing schedule followed by fast trains followed by analysis of cost-benefit imbalance if it may have had any. in my opinion, building railway lines for faster trains may not provide enough benefits compared to the investment it requires.
People want high-speed trains inbetween cities as many of them are now commuting to nearby cities to work. Trains, generally, do not have the problem of wasting time in traffic, which allow it to run on an fixed time schedule. This relieves the mental pressure on commuters who wait for bus in bus stops for hours.Moreover, faster trains, indeed, saves significant amount of travel time. The Times reported that the proportion of Tokyo's residents going to work to a nearby city Kyoto has increased considerably after the connection of two cities by bullet trains.
That being said, the cost of construction of new railway lines can be devastating for a country's economy. Right from buying lands, laying lines and connecting electricity to launching trains the cost can outgrow the benefits it provide. Japan went bankrupt after investing in building high-speed train corridors between Tokyo and Kyoto. Although Japanese used this transport extensively, Japan was unable to fetch the investment from its profits.
In conclusion, people argue in the favour of connecting cities with high-speed trains for its shorter and perfect travel timings, but the amount of money it engulfs can leave any country in debt and generations of its citizens to come to repay it. Thus, the clear deficit in benefits compared to its construction's cost , people should opt to improve existing public transportation, which costs far less than a new construction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...nefit imbalance if it may have had any. in my opinion, building railway lines for ...
^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...me in traffic, which allow it to run on an fixed time schedule. This relieves the ...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...who wait for bus in bus stops for hours.Moreover, faster trains, indeed, saves significa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...ns the cost can outgrow the benefits it provide. Japan went bankrupt after investing in...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the favour of connecting cities with high-speed trains for its shorter and pe...
^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...efits compared to its constructions cost , people should opt to improve existing p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32573289902 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82655371191 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609120521173 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5306888395 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236838724327 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816571283491 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804941890827 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140238199031 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701969643755 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.