In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, governments in many countries have to deal with lots of challenges in innovating the quality of transportation. There are also some opposite ideas about how they should do that: one tend to believe that modern infrastructure such as high-speed trains' railways should be constructed while the other thinks spending money on existing means is a better way.
On the one hand, nobody can deny the advantages of high-speed trains. As we all know, those modern transport are the ideal means for people who are in hurry and need to reach their arrival as soon as possible. Besides, one of the most important benefits of high-speed trains is their large system of railway lines connecting different areas - which gives us a chance to travel to other cities conveniently. So, we can realize that the advantages of modern transportation can be observed in several aspects of life.
However, the biggest drawback of such an innovative mean as high-speed train is its expense. Absolutely, the more modern it is, the more expensively it costs, we have to accept that fact. But in many poor countries, governments can't afford to build railway lines system because it requires an enormous amount of money. Therefore, it is more suitable for them to develop existing transport instead. For example, they can extend ways for motorbikes and cars, combine with improving the quality of buses or normal trains. Furthermore, taking more measures to reduce congestion is also an effective way to help inhabitants move more conveniently and save their time as well.
In conclusion, I tend to think that spending money on existing transport is a better solution and more suitable for almost countries because of its reasonable expense. After all, governments should do their best to innovate transport system to offer convenience and comfort for citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...But in many poor countries, governments cant afford to build railway lines system be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14666666667 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8688857039 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576666666667 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3440926108 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235022058701 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735044892807 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728934551514 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151279070383 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478763588941 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.