in a number of countries, some people think it's necessary to spend a large amount of money on building very high-speed railways between the cities. While other consider money should be spent on developing existing public transport.
discuss both views and give your opinion
In many countries, people believe building bullet trains (fast trains) that connects the cities is a much needed upgrade and favors spending huge funds on projects like these. While some other believe developmental funds should be focused on uplifting already existing public transportation. I am convinced that both facilities have potential to serve beneficial for the people and the countries economic growth. This essay intends to examine reasons and examples of both perspectives.
When humans learnt to move from one place to other, need for better transportation facilities rose exponentially. Countries like Japan and China have already pioneered in this field, they have high speed railway lines extending across its boundaries which connects most important cities of those nations. For instance, people are really keen on hightech transporatation, because this faciliates the movement of people and goods across great distances in such an unimaginable speed. Thereby, making lives easier for working class people who does not has the need to settle in big cities just for work.
On the other hand, some people consider public transport as the lifeline for cities growth. It is the primary medium of transport for many middle-class people within a city. If money spent on building new bridges, roads the overcrowded traffics will significantly decrease. As well as, by increasing the frequency of intercity rail and metro trains more passengers can move across locations in shorter period of time.
To conclude, a country should spend money on improving its transporation facilites, while many factors comes into consideration on investing money for transport facility either laying high speed rail routes or using prexisting public transport. Thus, the two means benefit the people finally, both can be used based on the need to any particular locations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ding huge funds on projects like these. While some other believe developmental funds ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: have
...r for working class people who does not has the need to settle in big cities just f...
^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rs can move across locations in shorter period of time. To conclude, a country should spen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'factors'' or 'factor's'?
Suggestion: factors'; factor's
...its transporation facilites, while many factors comes into consideration on investing m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, really, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in short, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47750865052 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84006539226 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3278027336 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297254289203 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960460904051 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072457507783 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182023928713 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466545951878 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.