the plan below shows the public park when it is first opened in 1920 and the same park today
Discuss summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparison wherever necessary
The two plans provide information about the Grange park in the year 1920 (year of inaugration) as well as the present day.
Overall, Both plans have two park entrances and it is the one of the consistent feature of Grange park that have not been changed. Most evident changes can be seen in the rearrangement of seats and rose garden.
In 1920s, Grange Park had a water fountain in the center and stage for musicians to its left, it also had pond for water plants and glasshouse facing each other to the right corner of the park. There are 5 seat compartments and 3 Rose gardens in the park and located close to the parks outer boundry.
Present day Grange park has many striking changes such as amphitheater for musical concerts, cafe, children’s play area and water feature. Central fountain is now replaced with rose graden and seatings are arranged around the garden. Underground car parking is available and its entrance is located in the right corner near the water feature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1920s'.
Suggestion: In the 1920s
...rangement of seats and rose garden. In 1920s, Grange Park had a water fountain in th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49271020897 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6218868246 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174701114763 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804240926023 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603269541513 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117926838706 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032019083315 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.