It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
“It is impossible for the humans to control natural destination always”. In this world, every death is compensated by many birth and vice versa. So it is practical and natural for some beings like dinosaurs, dodos to get extinct with passing years and human interruption of this cycle plays in a minimum role. This essay highly favours the given ideology and there are handful of points have to be discussed in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, animals including human beings and other creatures have got appeared in this magical world with their life time clock ticking each second. Ecosystem gets balanced this way and it can be interrupted by none and making efforts to block may result in the imbalance of our motherly nature’s cycle. For example, many scientists have discovered by modifying the gene telomerase may results in decrease in the process of ageing in humans but these efforts may turn against people in many dangerous way too.
Likewise, animals get mass destruction through natural disaster which is not merely induced by so called human beings. For example, the big forest fire in Africa destroys millions of wildly creatures without the negative part being played by human race. Natural cycle is believed to the mass end of some creatures just to get replaced with the more evolved form and humans with highest form of intelligence have no role to play here for the benefit of ecosystem itself.
However, just letting species get in the past sentence and humans not playing a role to protect it, is not always healthy. since this route will lead to the extinction of all creatures eventually because of the lack of human help. Humans must protect their possible way to not being the cause of their mass death and forbid all the ways that lead to that extinction unconsciously.
In this era of black hole discovery, there is an end to everything just everything and it has no exception to dinosaurs. Humans may not interrupt to stand away from environmental balance disruption. But it is necessary to not induce the cause for the extinction of such beautiful creatures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun birth seems to be countable; consider using: 'many births'.
Suggestion: many births
...is world, every death is compensated by many birth and vice versa. So it is practical and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
...avours the given ideology and there are handful of points have to be discussed in the f...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...peared in this magical world with their life time clock ticking each second. Ecosystem ge...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fying the gene telomerase may results in decrease in the process of ageing in hum...
^^
Line 6, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...millions of wildly creatures without the negative part being played by human race...
^^
Line 6, column 375, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...d with the more evolved form and humans with highest form of intelligence have no role to pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...e to protect it, is not always healthy. since this route will lead to the extinction ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98300283286 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61417376108 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552407932011 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1460812229 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149133037785 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537695430431 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260280745113 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895081440956 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261563668082 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.