oday the high sales of popular goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real need of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

oday, the high sales of popular goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real need of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The significance of advertising always debatable has now which was become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. However, at present most of the products are depending on the advertisement for increasing sale rate which are unnecessary community. In my opinion, authorities should be improved product quality to advers which is more logical. This essay will explain attributing to this trend along with examples in the looming paragraphs.

To begin with, nowadays many owners who produce commodities are investing on advers where the goods are not requiered by public. Moreover, if authorities want to grow sale, they should manufacture these goals which are actually need in city along with should focus on quality. To take an example, if owners make useful stuffs for community, the sale rate will climb up surprisingly. For instance, many
angladeshi electronic companies prefer the quality as well as quantity of daily needs and they grow with high sale in every year. Thus, it is clear that Why owners should provide necessary goods with better quality.

On the other hand, if owners avoid creating huge number of elements, the idea will reduce manufacturing cost as well as transporting cost. Furthermore, the authorities of industries when get benefits for correct products, they should invest on advertisement for rising sale and people also receive data for the idea which will influence them to purchase. For example, individuals get inspiered from advers which they like most and try to purchase for daily we. Hence, everyone should be concerned to produce products along with invest in advers.

To sum up, according to the argument one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of advertising are instrumental indeed. However, owners should be focused on not only advertising power but also the product quality which is useful for every community.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isagree. However, at present most of the products are depending on the advertisem...
^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...wever, at present most of the products are depending on the advertisement for increasing sal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creasing sale rate which are unnecessary community. In my opinion, authorities sh...
^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...ufacture these goals which are actually need in city along with should focus on qual...
^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...limb up surprisingly. For instance, many angladeshi electronic companies prefer t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31147540984 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81013254744 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567213114754 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5274348689 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2666666667 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143883254319 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519844996002 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386401296671 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921849953148 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148707947301 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isagree. However, at present most of the products are depending on the advertisem...
^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...wever, at present most of the products are depending on the advertisement for increasing sal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creasing sale rate which are unnecessary community. In my opinion, authorities sh...
^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...ufacture these goals which are actually need in city along with should focus on qual...
^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...limb up surprisingly. For instance, many angladeshi electronic companies prefer t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31147540984 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81013254744 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567213114754 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5274348689 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2666666667 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143883254319 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519844996002 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386401296671 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921849953148 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148707947301 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.