One long-distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several years time but they cause the same amount of pollution so some people think that we should discourage non - essential flights such as tourist travel, rather than to limit the use of cars.

Essay topics:

One long-distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several years time but they cause the same amount of pollution so some people think that we should discourage non - essential flights such as tourist travel, rather than to limit the use of cars. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that fuel consumption is more in one long distance plan as compared to car. These flights are causing equally amount of pollution, which car causes during number of years. Few groups believe that we should avoid flights, which are non-essential, while others think that we should limit the usage of cars. I strongly inclind with that the number of cars should be limited and reasons for my side will be elaborated with examples before reaching a concrete conclusion.

First and for most, long-distance flights not only easy and time saving option but also it is covinent option for traveling. Secondly, fuel use in that airplan is different than fuel use in car, which cause less detrimental effects in environment. Thirdly, we can not discourage people who are using flights for travel the world because it is not prectical. For example, in the U.S.A majority of people are using airtravel for travel and if we try to discourage them that they are not using flights then no one would be listen it. Hence, it can be said that it is not practical option to discourage flights.

Another most prominent point is that number of cars might be limited and perhaps it is prectical. Moreover, people have an better option in cars like, electric car or people may use public transport, which is helpfull to reduce harmfull gases in the eco-system. For instance, causing of pollution is depend on enginee of plane and car. Majority of plan enginees are regularly maintained by engineers thus, long flight are not as harmfull as cars because numbers of cars are myriad.

To conclude, I strongly disagree that we should discourage long distance flights because it is not acceptable by everyone and pragmatic approach. Whereas, limiting number of cars are possible by adpoting e-car concept and public awarness for mother nature.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that fuel consumption is more...
^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...at we should limit the usage of cars. I strongly inclind with that the number of cars should be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fore reaching a concrete conclusion. First and for most, long-distance flight...
^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
..., fuel use in that airplan is different than fuel use in car, which cause less detri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... not prectical. For example, in the U.S.A majority of people are using airtravel ...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctical option to discourage flights. Another most prominent point is that num...
^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...it is prectical. Moreover, people have an better option in cars like, electric ca...
^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
.... For instance, causing of pollution is depend on enginee of plane and car. Majority o...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... because numbers of cars are myriad. To conclude, I strongly disagree that w...
^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs of cars are myriad. To conclude, I strongly disagree that we should disco...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60449316276 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9482722548 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406807066101 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136996030734 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682055089047 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240481815325 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624891278376 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.