Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and what is wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Few people assert that it is teachers responsibility to teach students, what is right and what is wrong for good behaviour. Whereas, other deems that it is not teachers job and teachers should teach only academic subjects. I think that teachers may teach to students how to behave well but it is not their responsibility. This essay discuss both the arguments before reaching to concrete conclusion.
On one side of the coin, it can be say that teachers have many tasks to complete during academic hours like, course completion, paper checking, taking class. Furthermore, the are not bound to teach other aspects of life such as, what is right and what is wrong for behaviour. Teachers are paid for teach only academics and give knowledge to students for relevent subjects as well as for field. For example, in majority of schools teachers are teaching only study related subjects because they do not have sufficient time to teach moral aspects of behaviour.
On flip side of the coin, perhaps teachers are one and only personality, who can teach how to choose what is right when students are in dilemma. Another most prominent point is that the students may listen their teachers as compared to parents and apply their advice seriously. For instant, one survey done by MIT university shows that in teenage boys and girls are not listening their parents advice deliberately but they are listening their teacher seriously. For that reason teachers should teach students, what is right and what is wrong foe behaviour.
All the points elaborated above it can be concluded that it is not teachers responsibility to teach good behaviour related asspects to students. I strongly believe that it is true because students can learn judgement related points from parents also. At the end parents would be make rainbow future of students by teaching good behaviour and teachers by increasing academic knowledge of students.
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views 73
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people s sugar consumption while others think that it is individual s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat Discuss both views and g 84
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many. However, there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- One long-distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several years time but they cause the same amount of pollution so some people think that we should discourage non - essential flights such as tourist travel, rather than to limit the use of cars. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er checking, taking class. Furthermore, the are not bound to teach other aspects of lif...
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...n judgement related points from parents also. At the end parents would be make rainb...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, whereas, as for, for example, i think, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06940063091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65924050647 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473186119874 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5490610859 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.133333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.530489684943 0.244688304435 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199473303287 0.084324248473 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107092434313 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348423110165 0.151304729494 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121450658452 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.