Online shopping is becoming more popular. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of work required?
It has been recently claimed that the trendiest way of exchange is online shopping. However, its negative impact on the environment as for plastic pollution cannot be denied. Therefore, a large amount of research has been undertaken by the government in order to create the most efficient solution which can preserve the ecosystem from being poisoned.
The aspect to consider regarding the less interesting features of online shopping concerns environmental pollution. It can be observed that most online goods are covered by nylon or plastic packaging, then delivered to consumers, due to their cheap cost and convenience. However, being made from non-biodegradable materials takes those packaging a long time to decompose which will cause damage to the ecosystem, once they are discarded into the environment. For instance, if water is blanketed in nylon bags, they will find their way into the digestive and respiratory system of flora and fauna under water. As long as this issue persists, the variety of animals, not only under water but also others, will be led to extinction.
With this consideration in mind, the government should react immediately to protect the ecosystem from the disadvantage of online shopping. In my subjective opinion, the packaging made from non-degradable materials should be taxed heavily, while declining for the friendly one. When the revenue and profit are influenced by those tax policies, considering changing another packaging with lower rates such as papers or boxes will come to the online owner’s mind. As a consequence, when there is a decrease in demand, the factories or suppliers, who produce plastic and nylon packaging, will reduce the amount of those materials manufactured or change into creating friendly environmental substances. Should this become true in the future, there will be no plastic bag and ever-increasing biodegradable materials will be invented, which leads to a cleaner environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-13 | janette | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | Le Bich Diep | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-24 | nhikhietman | 11 | view |
| 2020-03-27 | nagakhoa | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-26 | nagakhoa | 89 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- A person spends most of his or her time at the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eap cost and convenience. However, being made from non-biodegradable materials ta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, as for, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45065789474 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06719917612 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7069189996 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.461538462 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.071972095865 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308081848674 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287167841047 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498124154384 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00579145336192 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eap cost and convenience. However, being made from non-biodegradable materials ta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, as for, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45065789474 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06719917612 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7069189996 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.461538462 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.071972095865 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308081848674 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287167841047 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498124154384 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00579145336192 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.