Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores.
Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that in our modern society online shopping has become the major shopping approach. Although this is an inevitable trend as our technology progression that online shopping has substituted stores shopping, from my personal perspective, I think this is a positive development.
On the one hand, it is a positive development from the aspects of customer and online store for variety reasons. Firstly, customers are now able to buy the products they like no matter when and where they are. For example, we can shop and place orders at mid-night when the shops are closed, and even buy clothes from overseas. Secondly, online markets enable to reduce the selling price to customers due to their inexpensive costs. Compared to stores, they are unnecessary to pay that much staff’s wages, bills and maybe insurances. As a result, it is beneficial for customers due to a better price provided and much more convenient.
Nevertheless, there are some more reasons that I think it is a positive development. By facilitating shopping, currency is able to circulate worldwide to boost some countries’ financial. For instance, countries of manufacturing and producing products are more likely to be financially supported by from those customer who are from affluent countries. Moreover, some people may argue that online shopping would suppress stores hence increase the jobless rate by releasing much less vacancies. It is, however, that this trend in turn creates much more opportunity for website designers who are becoming more paramount. The countries’ economy, therefore, can be much flourish through this trend.
In conclusion, store shoppers are now gradually becoming online shoppers, and I believe this is a positive transformation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this customer' or 'those customers'?
Suggestion: this customer; those customers
...ely to be financially supported by from those customer who are from affluent countries. Moreov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vacancies is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ease the jobless rate by releasing much less vacancies. It is, however, that this tr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41818181818 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07595097168 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5738030759 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238609835156 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792736487358 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869176321426 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157508369109 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083311460131 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.