The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is said that there is one way to reduce the dangers for drivers is to give punishments which are stricter on driving violation. This essay disagrees with this perspective because people have a tendency to do opposite when they are forced to do something and governments can launch campaigns to enhance resident’s awareness instead of setting higher punishments.
The first reason why governmnets should not put higher punishments is people don’t want to do what they are forced. The higher punishments may increase the frustration in each people, so that they tend to break the rules even though they know it is not good and they may have to pay punish charges. For example, acrossing the red lights is offenses and if we don’t wait for the lights, we will fines a big amount of money, but the fact that many people across the lights whenever they can.
The another main reason why stricter pinishments should not be applied is that it is not the only way to increase safety for drivers, governments can launch campaigns to increase citizen’s awareness. The principal concept in these campaigns is about the consiquences of breaking the rules in both law and medical perspective. This way may be a long term policy but it will change people’s mind. For instance, in 2007 Vietnam’s government launched the campaign to encourage residents to wear helmets while driving but it had not a big affect at an early stage. However, 3 years later, most of Vietnamses wore helmets in road.
Setting higher punishments when breaking the traffic rules is not the only way to keep safe for drivers because people don’t want to be forced to do something, they tend to do the opposite and governments can achieve their purposes by launching campaigns to change people’s mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'fine'
Suggestion: fine
...f we don’t wait for the lights, we will fines a big amount of money, but the fact tha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...mets while driving but it had not a big affect at an early stage. However, 3 years later,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.926910299 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72249761159 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524916943522 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.149489669 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.818181818 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180054127249 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708082764095 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554305591979 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115658196661 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035422469669 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.