The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some people argue that lowering the number of automobiles running in urban areas can be achieved by eliminating the majority of people to commute from home for work, universities/schools, or shopping. As far as I am concerned, I totally disagree with the following statement and the reasons for that is been explained below.
First of all, Traffic in metropolitan cities is significantly increased over the years; and due to this, A variety of serious issues has emerged. One of the major drawbacks is Air pollution, caused by the exhaust emitted by the various vehicles running around. Secondly, loud noise created by running engines or by honking is also the biggest challenge faced by the residents in the city who walk by the streets. Therefore, The term Traffic covers a great no of difficulties in it and due to which people these days trying to find a way to overcome those difficulties.
To overcome this situation, the only and best-proven method is to encourage people of all age groups to take public transport for their journey. To start with, The government authorities should provide various beneficiary schemes for the people commuting via public buses or trains and make it safe for the commuters. For example, one public bus can accommodate around 40 passengers which is equivalent to 20 individual cars. In this way, we can tackle the issue of traffic in any city. Last but not the least, The construction of roads should be according to the requirement and it should also be upgraded as needed from time to time for easy traffic flow.
To conclude this essay, I would say that the problem of traffic can be eliminated by various other methods and there is no need to restrict the people to go out for their businesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...refore, The term Traffic covers a great no of difficulties in it and due to which ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, first of all, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89562289562 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89755631952 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589225589226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4862036331 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248997962977 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841541835852 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467770942397 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145665171513 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640344650026 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.