In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future
The advent of technology and new business patterns sheds light on the booming of myriad new occupations, which leads to the uncertainty in defining which jobs to be viable in this day and age. I assure that this phenomenon emerged is due to the higher number of careers and the governmental control in business operations.
Admittedly, sorting out secure and stable jobs in the present time is much tiring owing to the grandiose figure of jobs. It is true that almost all governments in the world currently welcome the business of multinational companies and giant corporations in their countries, which benefits the labor markets. Furthermore, with the technological innovations, several new-formed jobs such as graphic designers, data analysts or account managers are created. These positions are strange with most of the elderly who customarily ascertain that only subsistence wage will be offered. As a result, the soaring number of newly-added occupations has challenged people in making a good prediction as to which one is secure while it requires only a simple guess in the past.
Furthermore, the difference in the business control of the government has made the selection for secure and successful jobs turn arduous at present. A conventional belief rooted at length signifies that working in the government's companies could support workers with pension and fringe benefits. These two elements were needed to find out whether a certain job was stable or not in the past when a good job was defined as the fixed payment gained monthly despite any unexpected situations happening. However, the story turns out differently in today's business market where the government intervention is not absolutely fierce. It is conspicuous that employees' payroll is now carried out by their employers who can generously offer handsome payment depending on the job responsibilities. In the modern epoch, a construction worker, for example, can receive up to 15 million VND while a blue-collar worker earns only a third of the former's salary, which makes the previous criteria obsolete and inapplicable.
By way of conclusion, there seems to be easier to declare which career is potential to follow in the past than these days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...solutely fierce. It is conspicuous that employees payroll is now carried out by their emp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 931, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'formers'' or 'former's'?
Suggestion: formers'; former's
...collar worker earns only a third of the formers salary, which makes the previous criter...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, third, while, as to, for example, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27247191011 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01427792643 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60393258427 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.4028374923 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.071428571 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165115556045 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050934620381 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494506629506 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976993514928 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023507496211 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.