In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.
To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Nowadays, some people treat shopping as a hobby, against they regard it as a household chore previously. In my view, this is a positive development which can be a benefit for our life.
It is no doubt that we are more willing to buy necessary living items. Compare with this, we often delay buying fresh food in the past. As a result, it may lead to an unhealthy lifestyle. For example, a couple might buy a lot of chilled food and keep them in the refrigerator instead of buying fresh vegetables and meats every day. However, this situation has improved significantly due to this trend. Another positive result of this change in attitudes is that shopping with family can promote the relationship between them. That is because we can spend more time communicating with family in the shopping mall, rather than just sitting before TV and without talking with each other.
On the other hand, some people argue that it has some bad influences. One of the reasons is that people might buy more unnecessary goods drive by consuming desires. As we all know, people can be happier when they buy new things, even after that they do not use them frequently or never use, due to the appealing of promoting by supermarkets. In addition, spending too much time on shopping will extremely waste our precious time. Formerly, we only go shopping when we really need to buy something. But today, many people often go to the mall just because they want to seek if there have any new good attract them and they would spend a lot of time wandering.
Ultimately, I would argue that regard shopping as a favor can improve the quality of life and the relationship between family, despite the fact that we might over consume and spend more time shopping than before.</span><br>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, so, for example, in addition, no doubt, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85436893204 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01478848909 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576051779935 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2172718032 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146941502933 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499521372578 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373592605991 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936773009817 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240757505809 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.