People believe that being literate in English allows you to acquire better jobs and thus allows one to have access to a better standard of living.
Up to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
English as a language has been immensely successful around the world, and it is one of the mostly spoken language in the world along with mandarin and hindi. Candidates who are versed in english are known to have a generous job opportunity, especially in a multinational company, and essentially allows to afford a better living standard. I completely agree with the above statement and possible reasons for this scenario will be explained in the following paragraph.
During and after the british rule, the colonized countries were exposed to the language of its ruler. Thus marks the beginning of the cascade and craze over the english language. In this contemporary world, english is spoken in almost all developed and developing nations and english is the mode of language in most prestigious universities of this globe.
Many firms offer jobs to those who are competent in both knowledge of their particular field of study as well as proficiency in english. Therefore, educational institutions are offering individual coaching for students and graduates to help them excel in the language. In addition, this proves they have an upperhand during job interviews. Once a candidate is granted a good job with appreciatable salary, the individual carrier development will have a gradual rise, thereby giving him a chance to make his standard of living better.
To conclude, It is really important to develop skill sets that makes the person a potential candidate for the job and i believe knowing english is one essential compotent of that skill set. Hence, this will offer him to reach further development in his carrier and eventually improving his living standard.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affording'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: affording
...ational company, and essentially allows to afford a better living standard. I completely ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...edge of their particular field of study as well as proficiency in english. Therefore, educ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n a potential candidate for the job and i believe knowing english is one essentia...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, really, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21111111111 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90561397859 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4848222589 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216137962603 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727749745513 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611223714355 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127150257656 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692432769286 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.