People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
At the contemporary market, buyers have a wider range of choices for more affordable commodities.Although some benefits can be seen from the phenomenon, the drawbacks are more significant.
The provision of cheaper goods presents several advantages. Regarding individual economical merits, customers now can enjoy inexpensive purchases of diverse types of goods, which is particularly favorable for the households with limited incomes. On the societal level, the affordability of consumer products promotes people’s purchasing power, which contributes to the development of the economy. It is common knowledge that the market’s demand for products increases when commodities’ exorbitant prices are reduced. Therefore, people will be attracted to buying these products on a large scale, fostering the general prosperity of a country’s economy.
However, those advantages above still cannot overshadow the disadvantages. As the goods’ prices are inexpensive and the quantity is huge to satisfy the market’s need , yet businesses still have to balance their capital and generate more profit , the quality of commodities might be taken for granted. In the long term, without quality products , customers will gradually lose their trust in those products’ manufacturers, which directly jeopardizes the economy . Another repercussion worth mentioning is that the environment may suffer. In order to meet the enormous demand from buyers, companies have to expand their factories and accelerate their production process , which causes much harm to the surrounding due to their toxic waste and exhaust .
In conclusion, the benefits of cheapening modern goods should not be overrated as the disadvantages are greater.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...choices for more affordable commodities.Although some benefits can be seen from the phen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s huge to satisfy the market's need , yet businesses still have to balance th...
^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e their capital and generate more profit , the quality of commodities might be tak...
^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the long term, without quality products , customers will gradually lose their tru...
^^
Line 4, column 478, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., which directly jeopardizes the economy . Another repercussion worth mentioning ...
^^
Line 4, column 687, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... and accelerate their production process , which causes much harm to the surroundi...
^^
Line 4, column 768, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing due to their toxic waste and exhaust . In conclusion, the benefits of cheap...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00803212851 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44047867346 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654618473896 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5396771982 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0836462581763 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033167121917 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343520075446 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0457114830691 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470501833068 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.