As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction.
To what extent do you agree with such a procedure?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words
Following the development of technology, people have invented various ways of improving mankind’s living not only psychologically but also physically. As a matter of fact, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare organs could bring to the world positive impacts but also possibly create some chaos within the society. Further in this essay, I will dive deeper into the situation and discuss about the potential outcomes.
First and foremost, it is obvious that body parts do not grow back, however, they can be replaced. As a result, cloning a person’s anatomy is a wonderful solution as people can now reproduce any body parts they demand. Not only can they can sustain life but also heal a person back to whole without a problem. In addition, this way would reduce the number of miserable people who had suffered from war and accidents. Moreover, these spare organs are no longer a rare thing for students, it gives them a good chance to study the body parts lively, not through pictures. Not just that, they also provide an amazing opportunity for scientists as well as researchers to experiment them, reduce the amount of drug testing time. Undoubtedly, cloning human beings is a truly mind-blowing gift as it could offer magnificent benefits by altering the biological aspect of a person in unimaginable ways.
On the other hand, the method is clearly a two-sided blade for its inhuman actions that affect directly on the artificial person. Undeniably, the new-born person is used and exploited on spare body parts but it poses many moral issues such as how cloned people should be treated. Controversially, they are also human just like any of the other, these artificial beings deserve as much human rights as anyone who created them. Furthermore, the money invested in the project of cloning is incredibly expensive and mostly believed to be unworthy, as a result, it might be better off used in other fields. Additionally, criminals can also now be able to fake their fingerprints for someone else, this could produce unforeseen problems. As a consequence, this method is extremely risky as it could generate a number of surprise factors.
In conclusion, although the idea of cloning human beings could bring wonderful and positive changes to the community, it ought to be forbidden as it would hold countless issues among the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...y create some chaos within the society. Further in this essay, I will dive deeper into ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
...ul solution as people can now reproduce any body parts they demand. Not only can they ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03562340967 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77846516885 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564885496183 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2964395423 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.411764706 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207514290137 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596121762072 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049479365408 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12288490968 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150853254686 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.